Informal Network Integration and MNEs Territorial Embeddedness: Mapping Differences
This article deals with a theoretical opposition of two similar, but conceptually different spatial models of transborder network cooperation (namely MNEs’ territorial embeddedness and informal network integration) from the aspect of corporate power asymmetry of firms participating in such network s...
Guardado en:
Autores Principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online |
Idioma: | eng |
Publicado: |
EdiUNS
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.uns.edu.ar/ee/article/view/2881 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:oai.revistas.uns.edu.ar:article-2881 |
---|---|
recordtype |
bda |
spelling |
oai:oai.revistas.uns.edu.ar:article-28812022-06-25T20:39:12Z Informal Network Integration and MNEs Territorial Embeddedness: Mapping Differences Integración informal de redes e integración territorial de las EMN: mapeo de diferencias Sapir, Elena Vasilchenko, Alexander Integración informal de redes Inserción territorial EMN RPG Red Efectos Asimetría de poder corporativo Sistemas productivos Informal network integration Territorial embeddedness MNE GPN Network Effects Corporate power asymmetry Productive system This article deals with a theoretical opposition of two similar, but conceptually different spatial models of transborder network cooperation (namely MNEs’ territorial embeddedness and informal network integration) from the aspect of corporate power asymmetry of firms participating in such network structures. Two external phenomena of power asymmetry (symmetry) are presented giving as example cases of territorial embeddedness and informal network integration in North America and East Asia regions. The study is resulted in several features allowing the attribution of specific transborder production systems to be proposed to different types of network structures. The latter is done by a consideration of network characteristics, network effects and specifics of network core and periphery interaction. El artículo aborda la oposición teórica de dos modelos espaciales similares, pero conceptualmente diferentes, de cooperación transfronteriza en red (a saber, la integración territorial de las EMN y la integración informal de la red) desde el aspecto de la asimetría de poder corporativo de las empresas que participan en tales estructuras de red. Se presentan dos fenómenos externos de asimetría (simetría) de poder dando como ejemplo los casos de incrustación territorial e integración informal de redes en las regiones de América del Norte y Asia Oriental. El estudio presenta varias características que permiten proponer la atribución de sistemas de producción transfronterizos específicos a diferentes tipos de estructuras de red. Esto último se hace mediante una consideración de las características de la red, los efectos de la red y los detalles de la interacción del núcleo y la periferia de la red. EdiUNS 2022-06-25 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article Artículo evaluado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.uns.edu.ar/ee/article/view/2881 10.52292/j.estudecon.2022.2881 Estudios económicos; Vol. 39 No. 79 (2022); 249-269 Estudios económicos; Vol. 39 Núm. 79 (2022); 249-269 Estudios económicos; v. 39 n. 79 (2022); 249-269 2525-1295 0425-368X eng https://revistas.uns.edu.ar/ee/article/view/2881/1897 Derechos de autor 2022 Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 4.0) de Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
institution |
UNS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital Académica |
building |
Biblioteca Central Biblioteca de Economía |
bda_str |
Estudios Económicos |
hierarchy_parent_id |
bda_ee |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Estudios Económicos |
hierarchy_top_id |
bda_str |
hierarchy_top_title |
Biblioteca Digital Académica |
first_indexed |
2018-08-22T17:39:27Z |
last_indexed |
2018-08-22T17:39:27Z |
language |
eng |
format |
Online |
author |
Sapir, Elena Vasilchenko, Alexander |
spellingShingle |
Sapir, Elena Vasilchenko, Alexander Informal Network Integration and MNEs Territorial Embeddedness: Mapping Differences |
author_facet |
Sapir, Elena Vasilchenko, Alexander |
author_sort |
Sapir, Elena |
title |
Informal Network Integration and MNEs Territorial Embeddedness: Mapping Differences |
title_short |
Informal Network Integration and MNEs Territorial Embeddedness: Mapping Differences |
title_full |
Informal Network Integration and MNEs Territorial Embeddedness: Mapping Differences |
title_fullStr |
Informal Network Integration and MNEs Territorial Embeddedness: Mapping Differences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Informal Network Integration and MNEs Territorial Embeddedness: Mapping Differences |
title_sort |
informal network integration and mnes territorial embeddedness: mapping differences |
topic_facet |
Integración informal de redes Inserción territorial EMN RPG Red Efectos Asimetría de poder corporativo Sistemas productivos Informal network integration Territorial embeddedness MNE GPN Network Effects Corporate power asymmetry Productive system |
description |
This article deals with a theoretical opposition of two similar, but conceptually different spatial models of transborder network cooperation (namely MNEs’ territorial embeddedness and informal network integration) from the aspect of corporate power asymmetry of firms participating in such network structures. Two external phenomena of power asymmetry (symmetry) are presented giving as example cases of territorial embeddedness and informal network integration in North America and East Asia regions. The study is resulted in several features allowing the attribution of specific transborder production systems to be proposed to different types of network structures. The latter is done by a consideration of network characteristics, network effects and specifics of network core and periphery interaction. |
publisher |
EdiUNS |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://revistas.uns.edu.ar/ee/article/view/2881 |
_version_ |
1760274142414766080 |
score |
12,614403 |